The Wedding of the King of Kings

Objections to a United Olivet Discourse– Answers!

Are there valid distinctions between the “first section” of Matthew 24 and the so-called “second section” that demand that the Discourse is about two radically different subjects, i.e. the destruction of Jerusalem and the end of the world?

View More Objections to a United Olivet Discourse– Answers!
Who is This Babylon

A Response to Steve Whitsett’s Review of the Sergius Bale – V- Preston Debate on the Dating of Revelation

Anytime you have to overtly, willfully alter the reading of the Biblical text to support your eschatology, that is a sure sign your doctrine is wrong!

View More A Response to Steve Whitsett’s Review of the Sergius Bale – V- Preston Debate on the Dating of Revelation
Who is This Babylon

A Response to Sam Frost’s Article: The Great City Is Every City But No City

To totally ignore the real, undeniable historical realities of the sins of Babylon, and then project her sins onto other nations who had never done those things, amounts to exegetical fraud

View More A Response to Sam Frost’s Article: The Great City Is Every City But No City
Who is This Babylon

Responding to Simon Kistemaker’s Revealing Chapter on the Dating of Revelation -#8

  RESPONDING TO SIMON KISTEMAKER’S REVEALING CHAPTER ON REVELATION #8 Don K. Preston (D. Div.) This is article #8 in response to a chapter written…

View More Responding to Simon Kistemaker’s Revealing Chapter on the Dating of Revelation -#8
Who is This Babylon

Review and Response to Simon Kistemaker’s Dating of Revelation #4

The fact that John was told that the interpretation of the seven hills was seven kings, (not kingdoms) invalidates Kistemaker’s objections to the dating of Revelation.

View More Review and Response to Simon Kistemaker’s Dating of Revelation #4