Unorthodox Eschatology? A New Inquisition!

Amazingly, (Revealingly) a list of prominent Reformed representatives issued a letter condemning the full preterist view, and accusing Gary DeMar of supporting that view! I have challenged them– any of the leading representatives- to meet me in formal debate to defend their charges. So far, not a keystroke of response!

View More Unorthodox Eschatology? A New Inquisition!
The Wedding of the King of Kings

Objections to a United Olivet Discourse– Answers!

Are there valid distinctions between the “first section” of Matthew 24 and the so-called “second section” that demand that the Discourse is about two radically different subjects, i.e. the destruction of Jerusalem and the end of the world?

View More Objections to a United Olivet Discourse– Answers!
Study of the End of the Law

Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses: Terry Benton’s Second Affirmative

Benton’s Second Affirmative Resolved: Obligation to the Law of Moses ended at the cross of Christ. Affirmed: Terry W. Benton Denied: Signed–Don K. Preston My…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses: Terry Benton’s Second Affirmative
The Wedding of the King of Kings

Short Shot: The Absent Master in Matthew 21 and 25

If Matthew 25:14f is parallel to Matthew 21:33jf– and it is– the all futurist eschatologies are false!

View More Short Shot: The Absent Master in Matthew 21 and 25

What Were “All These Things” in The Olivet Discourse?- #2

  Yesterday 12-3-19 I posted part one of Dr. Dallas Burdette’s response to Sam Frost’s contrived claims on Matthew 24:2-3. Frost argues that when Jesus…

View More What Were “All These Things” in The Olivet Discourse?- #2