Are there valid distinctions between the “first section” of Matthew 24 and the so-called “second section” that demand that the Discourse is about two radically different subjects, i.e. the destruction of Jerusalem and the end of the world?View More Objections to a United Olivet Discourse– Answers!
Many commentators claim that Daniel 12:1 foretold the time of Antiochus Epiphanes as the great tribulation,. But the Bible and history completely falsifies that claim.View More Antiochus Epiphanes and the Great Tribulation
Benton’s Second Affirmative Resolved: Obligation to the Law of Moses ended at the cross of Christ. Affirmed: Terry W. Benton Denied: Signed–Don K. Preston My…View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses: Terry Benton’s Second Affirmative
Well, time is up folks! The following comment was posted on my YouTube video just today– very early morning– of 6-10-2021. Now, I assume the…View More The Rapture! Today or Tomorrow!?!?
If Matthew 25:14f is parallel to Matthew 21:33jf– and it is– the all futurist eschatologies are false!View More Short Shot: The Absent Master in Matthew 21 and 25
Yesterday 12-3-19 I posted part one of Dr. Dallas Burdette’s response to Sam Frost’s contrived claims on Matthew 24:2-3. Frost argues that when Jesus…View More What Were “All These Things” in The Olivet Discourse?- #2
Just recently, (2019) on FaceBook, Sam Frost proposed a truly unique (and aberrant) view of Matthew 24:1-3 and the Olivet Discourse. He suggested that the…View More The Olivet Discourse- Matthew 24:2- What Were “all of these things”?- #1
Responding to the Critics: What About Matthew 10:23- #2 Be sure to read the first installment of this series as we continue Responding to…View More Responding to the Critics: What About Matthew 10:23?- #2