https://www.store.bibleprophecy.com/product/watching-for-the-parousia-were-jesus-apostle-confused/

Responding to the Critics: A Look at Roderick Edwards’ Book: About Preterism – #4

Edward’s own Reformed view of God’s Sovereignty, which teaches that every single thing that happens was predestinated before the world began, means that the apostasy that did happen was in fact predestinated by God.

View More Responding to the Critics: A Look at Roderick Edwards’ Book: About Preterism – #4
https://www.store.bibleprophecy.com/product/watching-for-the-parousia-were-jesus-apostle-confused/

Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’ Book: What About Preterism? Article #3

The Lord never guaranteed that every man would understand that revelation as it was intended. We know from Scripture itself that they did not.

View More Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’ Book: What About Preterism? Article #3
https://www.store.bibleprophecy.com/product/watching-for-the-parousia-were-jesus-apostle-confused/

Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’s Book: “About Preterism” – Article #2

In Edward’s view of God’s Sovereignty, i.e. in the Reformed / Calvinistic view, every single thing that is done or that occurs was / is predestinated. That means that if (since) there was an apostasy, a loss of proper understanding of eschatology, then that apostasy was foreordained / predestinated by God.

View More Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’s Book: “About Preterism” – Article #2
https://www.store.bibleprophecy.com/product/watching-for-the-parousia-were-jesus-apostle-confused/

Responding to the Critics: A Look at Roderick Edwards’ Book: About Preterism – Article #1

It should be obvious that Edwards actually disparages reliance on Sola Scriptura. He castigates “private interpretation” based on a distorted application of 2 Peter 1:20. Scripture no where- EVER – devalues private study, individual interpretation as Roderick Edwards does.

View More Responding to the Critics: A Look at Roderick Edwards’ Book: About Preterism – Article #1

What About 2 Peter 3:9– One Day is With the Lord as a Thousand Years?

ONE DAY IS WITH THE LORD AS A THOUSAND YEARS, OR, CAN GOD TELL TIME? Don K. Preston One of the most common objections lodged…

View More What About 2 Peter 3:9– One Day is With the Lord as a Thousand Years?
Study of the End of the Law

Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law: Don K. Preston’s Final Negative

Debate on the Passing of the Mosaic Law Formal Written Debate Disputants: Don K. Preston -V- Terry Benton Don K. Preston’s Third (Final) Negative Let…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law: Don K. Preston’s Final Negative
Who is This Babylon

Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bale’s Final Negative

This will be my 3rd negative in response to Preston’s 3rd and final affirmative. Preston is supposed to be arguing that: “The Book of Revelation…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bale’s Final Negative
Study of the End of the Law

Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law: Benton’s Final Affirmative

Benton-Preston Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses Benton’s Third Affirmative The proposition:  Obligation to the Law of Moses ended at the cross…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law: Benton’s Final Affirmative
Study of the End of the Law

Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses: Terry Benton’s Second Affirmative

Benton’s Second Affirmative Resolved: Obligation to the Law of Moses ended at the cross of Christ. Affirmed: Terry W. Benton Denied: Signed–Don K. Preston My…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses: Terry Benton’s Second Affirmative