Responding to the Critics| A Gross Abuse of Logic and Eschatology On Steve Baisden’s FaceBook page “As It Is Written” we have seen a number…View More Responding to the Critics| A Response to Howard Denham’s Syllogism
An Examination of the So-Called Contrasts in the Olivet Discourse Be sure to read the previous installments in this series on the Olivet Discourse: #1 …View More Matthew 24-25| Does the Olivet Discourse Discuss Two Comings of the Lord? #6
William Bell Responds to the Critics Howard Denham is a caustic, acerbic critic of Covenant Eschatology, who seems incapable of engaging in honorable, respectful dialogue. …View More Responding to the Critics| William Bell Responds to Howard Denham
I am very, very excited to announce a brand new book: The Hymenaean Heresy: Reverse the Charges! Are advocates of the full preterist view of…View More Announcing| Important New Book by Don K. Preston – The Hymenaean Heresy: Reverse the Charges!
John 5:24-29| Two Resurrections? In the previous installment we exposed some of the inconsistency in the Dominionist camp in regard to John5, and the issue…View More John 5:24-29| Two Resurrections? #4
Responding to the Critics|Christian, What Say Ye?? “Time makes the Christian doctrine of a second coming of Christ’ lose all credibility. If Jesus promised to…View More Responding to the Critics| Christian, What Say Ye?
William Bell is an excellent Bible student and great friend. In a recent Facebook exchange, the discussion turned to the passing of the Law of…View More The Passing of the Law of Moses| Guest Article by William Bell
Howard Denham is, without doubt, one of the most caustic ministers you will ever encounter. He seems to be incapable of having a respectful, courteous…View More Responding to the Critics| A Response to Howard Denham’s Response to Bell and Preston
We are examining the flawed hermeneutic of the futurist apologists. When debating with one another, they both utilize this flawed hermeneutic, and then condemn it,…View More A Fatally Flawed Hermeneutic – #4