https://www.store.bibleprophecy.com/product/watching-for-the-parousia-were-jesus-apostle-confused/

Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’ Book: What About Preterism? Article #3

The Lord never guaranteed that every man would understand that revelation as it was intended. We know from Scripture itself that they did not.

View More Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’ Book: What About Preterism? Article #3
https://www.store.bibleprophecy.com/product/watching-for-the-parousia-were-jesus-apostle-confused/

Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’s Book: “About Preterism” – Article #2

In Edward’s view of God’s Sovereignty, i.e. in the Reformed / Calvinistic view, every single thing that is done or that occurs was / is predestinated. That means that if (since) there was an apostasy, a loss of proper understanding of eschatology, then that apostasy was foreordained / predestinated by God.

View More Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’s Book: “About Preterism” – Article #2
https://www.store.bibleprophecy.com/product/watching-for-the-parousia-were-jesus-apostle-confused/

Responding to the Critics: A Look at Roderick Edwards’ Book: About Preterism – Article #1

It should be obvious that Edwards actually disparages reliance on Sola Scriptura. He castigates “private interpretation” based on a distorted application of 2 Peter 1:20. Scripture no where- EVER – devalues private study, individual interpretation as Roderick Edwards does.

View More Responding to the Critics: A Look at Roderick Edwards’ Book: About Preterism – Article #1

What About 2 Peter 3:9– One Day is With the Lord as a Thousand Years?

ONE DAY IS WITH THE LORD AS A THOUSAND YEARS, OR, CAN GOD TELL TIME? Don K. Preston One of the most common objections lodged…

View More What About 2 Peter 3:9– One Day is With the Lord as a Thousand Years?
Study of the End of the Law

Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law: Don K. Preston’s Final Negative

Debate on the Passing of the Mosaic Law Formal Written Debate Disputants: Don K. Preston -V- Terry Benton Don K. Preston’s Third (Final) Negative Let…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law: Don K. Preston’s Final Negative
Who is This Babylon

Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bale’s Final Negative

This will be my 3rd negative in response to Preston’s 3rd and final affirmative. Preston is supposed to be arguing that: “The Book of Revelation…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bale’s Final Negative
Study of the End of the Law

Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law: Benton’s Final Affirmative

Benton-Preston Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses Benton’s Third Affirmative The proposition:  Obligation to the Law of Moses ended at the cross…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law: Benton’s Final Affirmative
Study of the End of the Law

Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses: Terry Benton’s Second Affirmative

Benton’s Second Affirmative Resolved: Obligation to the Law of Moses ended at the cross of Christ. Affirmed: Terry W. Benton Denied: Signed–Don K. Preston My…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses: Terry Benton’s Second Affirmative
Study of the End of the Law

Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses- Terry Benton’s 1st Affirmative

Terry Benton’s First Affirmative Resolved: Obligation to the Law of Moses ended at the cross of Christ. Affirmed: Terry W. Benton Denied: Signed–Don K. Preston…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Passing of the Law of Moses- Terry Benton’s 1st Affirmative