If the Old Law could not pass until every jot and every tittle was fulfilled, and if Christ has not come, in judgment and the resurrection, then the Old Law remains fully in effect, binding and imposed.
View More About Matthew 5:17-18- Some Objections and Responses- #2Tag: full preterist
About Matthew 5:17-18- Some Objections and Answers- #1
If “All” in Matthew 5:17-18 truly means “all” comprehensively, then the Lord has come, the resurrection is fulfilled, and Israel remains God’s chosen, covenant people! If those things are not fulfilled, the Old Law remains in full force, and Israel remains God’s covenant people!
View More About Matthew 5:17-18- Some Objections and Answers- #1Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’s Book: “About Preterism” – Article #2
In Edward’s view of God’s Sovereignty, i.e. in the Reformed / Calvinistic view, every single thing that is done or that occurs was / is predestinated. That means that if (since) there was an apostasy, a loss of proper understanding of eschatology, then that apostasy was foreordained / predestinated by God.
View More Responding to the Critics: A Look At Roderick Edwards’s Book: “About Preterism” – Article #2What Now? If the Lord Came in AD 70, What Now? #1
What Now? If the Lord Came in AD 70, What Now? – #1 Traditional futurist eschatologies have a mixed bag of theological concepts about what…
View More What Now? If the Lord Came in AD 70, What Now? #1We Have Fled For Refuge- #2- The Law of Blood Atonement.
We Who Have Fled For Refuge-#2 A Look at The Law of Blood Atonement in Hebrews (and other texts). that by two immutable things, in…
View More We Have Fled For Refuge- #2- The Law of Blood Atonement.Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Don K. Preston’s First Negative
Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation Sergius Bale – V – Don K. Preston Don K. Preston’s First Negative All caps for emphasis…
View More Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Don K. Preston’s First NegativeDaniel 9- Succot and Shemini Atzerat- #1
The vast majority of commentators fail to notice that Daniel 9:24-27 is based on a “festal inclusio” meaning that it would be fulfilled when Israel’s festal calander was fulfilled– in AD 70! This is ground breaking!
View More Daniel 9- Succot and Shemini Atzerat- #1Refuting a Refutation – #2
Examining Sam Frost’s Attempt to Explain Why His Essays on the Resurrection Book is Wrong Sam Frost finally got around to writing a “refutation” of…
View More Refuting a Refutation – #2