Are there valid distinctions between the “first section” of Matthew 24 and the so-called “second section” that demand that the Discourse is about two radically different subjects, i.e. the destruction of Jerusalem and the end of the world?
View More Objections to a United Olivet Discourse– Answers!Tag: Olivet Discourse
Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bales’ First Negative
Here is Sergius Bale’s first negative presentation in our debate on the dating of Revelation. You can read my first affirmative here. In this debate,…
View More Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bales’ First NegativeResponding to the Critics- What About Zechariah 14?
Does Zechariah 14 falsify the preterist view of prophecy? Not at all! It totally confirms it!
View More Responding to the Critics- What About Zechariah 14?Short Shot: The Absent Master in Matthew 21 and 25
If Matthew 25:14f is parallel to Matthew 21:33jf– and it is– the all futurist eschatologies are false!
View More Short Shot: The Absent Master in Matthew 21 and 25A Short Shot: About Those Two Witnesses
Needless to say, the mention of the two witnesses in Revelation 11 have caused an endless amount of speculation and theological discussion. Attempts to identify…
View More A Short Shot: About Those Two Witnesses