Short Shot: Daniel 9:24f, Antiochus Epiphanes, Onias III and the Atonement

Short Shot: Daniel 9:24f, Antiochus Epiphanes, Onias III and the Atonement Don K. Preston It is commonly claimed among the higher, “critical” and “liberal” commentators…

View More Short Shot: Daniel 9:24f, Antiochus Epiphanes, Onias III and the Atonement

What About 2 Peter 3:9– One Day is With the Lord as a Thousand Years?

ONE DAY IS WITH THE LORD AS A THOUSAND YEARS, OR, CAN GOD TELL TIME? Don K. Preston One of the most common objections lodged…

View More What About 2 Peter 3:9– One Day is With the Lord as a Thousand Years?
Who is This Babylon

Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation– “Sergius Bale’s” Final Affirmative

To the reader: Let me apologize for the utterly disgusting verbiage in the following. just keep this in mind as you read. There is an…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation– “Sergius Bale’s” Final Affirmative
Who is This Babylon

Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Don K. Preston’s First Negative

Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation Sergius Bale – V – Don K. Preston Don K. Preston’s First Negative All caps for emphasis…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Don K. Preston’s First Negative
Who is This Babylon

Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bale’s First Affirmative

Sergius Bale’s First Affirmarive Bale’s Proposition: Resolved: The Book of Revelation, while not definitive, was likely written in the reign of Emperor Domitian (AD 90s)…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bale’s First Affirmative
Who is This Babylon

Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bale’s Final Negative

This will be my 3rd negative in response to Preston’s 3rd and final affirmative. Preston is supposed to be arguing that: “The Book of Revelation…

View More Formal Written Debate on the Dating of Revelation: Sergius Bale’s Final Negative